Andris Breže :
Barbara Gaile : Barbara Gaile is one of the more unorthodox representatives of Latvian contemporary art. The source and solution of her self-expression is in her thorough, complete and self-sufficient brand of minimalism.
THE ORGANIC WORKS OF BARBARA GAILE
It is common to break down contemporary art into various trends, to single out tendencies, establish conceptions and strategies, emphasise discourses, describe contexts, recognise conventionality and engage in other similar analytical procedures. This is normal for professional critics and art historians; it helps the audience of contemporary art to orient itself across the manifold space of the latest artistic culture. However, there are artists whose works are ill-suited for such analytic systematisation. One should also note that these are not outsiders but remarkable, talented artists. Of course, Mark Rothko, Cy Twombly, Yves Klein and Agnes Martin can be categorised as abstract artists but this does not help us much to understand their works. In addition, this inclusive definition tends to set them apart from the current trends in contemporary art but their art continues to attract us and is perceived as the best in contemporary painting.
It seems to me that the works of Barbara Gaile coincide with various conceptual strategies in contemporary art (such as field painting or salient painting) but first of all they relate to some exceptionally profound and strong artists. Besides those mentioned above, I could add other wonderful and radically different artists: Louise Bourgeois, Kaze Zimblyte, Rachel Whiteread, Mona Hatoum… Each of them features a distinctive evocative quality that is also typical of Barbara Gaile’s works. She, like the other artists mentioned, pays particular attention to the technological side of making an artwork, turning the process of creativity into an ecstatic procedure and expecting the appropriate perception from the viewer.
Barbara avoids a painterly approach, favouring texture instead; while emphasising the origin of colour in light and retaining the self-sufficient value of pigment, she preserves its “sound” but not its materiality. The materiality of Barbara’s works is recreated; it is different - like the materiality of a living organism… At the same time, the question of materiality recedes into the background; much more important is the life of that which Barbara has created and which would be difficult to call a painting in the traditional sense. It is life and interaction with us as spectators. The suggestive character of the works is so strong that they put us in a state of sustained contemplation and meditation. Barbara’s works appear to stand openly before the viewer yet at the same time they are closed in their autonomous existence. There is no open expression or narrative. It seems that we are contemplating some kind of living organisms, bodies with healed scars and opalescent skin… It is no longer either salient painting or still life but salient life – life created by the artist.
I get the impression that Barbara Gaile has now reached a certain peak in her artistic development, so convincingly does she cultivate her mastery, so stable is the technological side of her painting and her organic creative position. The originality of Gaile’s creativity expands the space of Latvian contemporary art; it gives the most recent art in the world added value and undoubtedly has its audience.
Leonid Bazhanov
Art critic, artistic director of the Russian National Centre for Contemporary Art
Daiga Krūze :
Ernests Kļaviņš : Through the simple / playful use of colour, drawing and animation, the intelligent provocateur has conjured up fables that make us smile and think... The titles of the works are important for decoding the connections – they serve as rejoinders.
Ivars Drulle :
Jānis Blanks :
Jānis Blanks is one of the most unpredictable and mystical artists of his generation, who dwells in his own space, untouched by external circumstances and events. The artist paints deeply and solemnly, unhurriedly relishing the time devoted to the process of painting.
The sources of Jānis Blanks’ inspiration are all around us – in nature, in human beings, in incidental intriguing events and dreams, which are converted into surrealist works of art through the force of the artist`s imagination.
Kalvis Zuters : Kalvis Zuters endows his painted images with his life experience – an unusual and peculiar, carefully guarded private world with a certain dose of solitude. He is an artist capable of defending his creative space against the irritants of the saturated outside world for the "full-bloodied construction" of the life of his characters, materialised in metaphysical images.
Kristiana Dimitere : "Kristiana`s art is live theatre, captured in mid-motion. The vivid colours conceal within themselves an omen of fate, which is also always present in the eyes of the characters and sometimes even outside of the picture."
This description by the artist`s mother, legendary Latvian actress Vija Artmane, helps understand the complicated world of Kristiana Dimitere`s art. She`s equally comfortable sculpting, painting, drawing, illustrating, and creating stage sets and animations.
The trump card of Kristiana Dimitere`s art is the plasticity of her shapes and the recognisable lines which tame the artist`s vibrant, fantastic characters so akin to the aesthetics of naïve art.
Kristians Brekte : Kristians Brekte is socially engaged artist who has participated in projects of various scale and already earned the reputation of a somewhat controversial creative figure.
Brave depicting of differently perceived world which is plentiful of fantasy, is a base for the artist's various activities which have been infuriated numerous fellow citizens. The fact that he pretty often brakes the bounds between sacred and forbidden themes, partly derives from his experience of eager graffiti artist.
The range of his artistic outlets is seemingly endless, from monumental ironic figurative compositions charged with powerful energy and seamlessly combining vast and free painting style, emphasized brutal brush strokes and local colour with brilliantly executed realistic representation in the stencil technique, to experiments in the area of organic sculpture. The dominating feel of the works is clear and easily recognizable: they deal with the line between the human and the animal realms, with death, the mythical element and sexuality.
http://kristiansbrekte.lv
Krišs Salmanis : Reserved, melancholic, intellectually justified and visually filigree - this briefly describes the artist Krišs Salmanis, who is no doubt one of the brightest representatives of contemporary art in Latvia.
http://www.salmanis.com/
Verners Lazdāns : "I'm interested in the incomprehensible in nature – in savagery that contains much undiscovered pre-programmed genuineness.
When creating an artwork, I strive to achieve that the painted character becomes a symbol for an emotional state or trait. Perhaps in this image you will find something I haven’t noticed by myself because of my partly intuitive manner of painting, which is not previously thought out in details.
I avoid explanatory ambience – landscapes and interior because I wish to focus on the image itself. I don’t consider the place where the character stands is so important neither the reality which overwhelms the image, but relevant is the fact of its essence.
The form of my human animals is often inspired by nature - by some animal, piece of rock, part of a bone, piece of wood and ore or even by a natural phenomenon."
Verners Lazdāns
Zenta Logina : "The identification signs of Zenta Logina are cosmic themes and usage of abstract shapes. Although both of them seem to be incompatible – there is no need to search for depiction and definite thematic in abstraction – the artist had been obviously interested in both during a long period of time – from the 60ties till the end of her life in 1983.
Besides the interest there was also a hard work that helped Zenta Logina to find her own original way of melting pure arts– enchantment of colors and shapes – togeather with images taken from cosmos research and supplementing it with great share of universalized symbolism
Not only innovative values of composition and extravagant stories but also a quality that is traditionally typical to Latvian art – refined sence of color, a skill of making them attached by special lucidity and ‘sonority’ - are features that make Logina’s artworks able to enchant.
Creating works in similar colouring or more rarely - in contrasting compositions of paint artist has often used glaze, loosening of surface, patina and subpainting techniques and such materials as varnish and bronze and aluminium powders.
Uncommonly consistant focusing on abstraction and choice of themes have raised lack of understanding each during different particular periods and have made mistrustful attitude of authorities of government and art field against works performed by artist. This has inconvenienced her work a lot and restricted posibilities to reach the audience.
Zenta Logina was excluded from The Artists' Union of Soviet Latvia in 1950 because of formalism. Her dedication to abstraction was considered as being too radical in Soviet art."
Vilnis Vējš
Renesanse, Renaissance
Psihedēlija Klusajā centrā. 25.02. - 12.04.2006., Psychedelia in the Quiet Centre. 25.02. - 12.04.2006.
Atmiņas par Itāliju. 05.06. - 20.08.2007., Memories of Italy. 05.06. - 20.08.2007.
Kristaps Ģelzis. Home Video. 10.12.2008. - 30.01.2009., Kristaps Ģelzis. Home Video. 10.12.2008. - 30.01.2009.
Kristīne Kursiša. Ārpus kontroles. 26.09 - 22.10. 2009., Kristīne Kursiša. Out Of Control. 26.09 - 22.10. 2009.
Mūsu laika ikonas. 27.10. - 14.12.2009., Contemporary Icons. 27.10. - 14.12.2009.
ARCOmadrid 2010. Gints Gabrans. 17 - 21.02. 2010., ARCOmadrid 2010. Gints Gabrans. 17 - 21.02.2010.
Jānis Blanks. Personālizstāde. 27.03. - 30.04.2010., Jānis Blanks. Solo show. 27.03. - 30.04.2010.
Kristians Brekte. Rīgas madonnas. 25.10. - 17.12.2010., Kristians Brekte. The Madonnas of Riga. 25.10. – 17.12. 2010.
Otto Zitmanis. Otto dusmas. 14.01. - 01.03.2011., Otto Zitmanis. Otto`s Anger. 14.01. - 01.03.2011.
Gints Gabrans. Asinsgaisma. 8.03. - 22.04.2011., Gints Gabrans. Bloodlight. 8.03. - 22.04.2011.
Ivars Drulle. Balstīts uz patiesiem notikumiem. 27.04 - 10.06.2011., Ivars Drulle. Based on True Stories. 27.04. - 10.06.2011.
Zenta Logina. Constellation. 11.07. - 02.09.2011, Zenta Logina. Constellation. 11.07. - 02.09.2011
Ernests Kļaviņš. Karš starp titāniem un rūķīšiem. 28.11. - 02.12.2011 , Ernests Kļaviņš. War Between the Titans and Gnomes
Kristiana Dimitere. Sekulārā rezonanse. 12.12.2011. - 10. 02.2012. , Kristiana Dimitere. Secular Resonance . 12.12.2011. - 10. 02.2012.
Verners Lazdāns. Nativus. 15.02. - 23.03. 2012., Verners Lazdāns. Nativus. 15.02. - 23.03. 2012.
Kristians Brekte. Absolūtais ļaunums. 2.04. - 17.05.2012. , Kristians Brekte. Absolute evil. 2.04. - 17.05.2012.
Krišs Salmanis. Uzticēšanās trauslums. 28.05. - 27.07.2012., Krišs Salmanis. The fragility of trust. 28.05. - 27.07.2012.
ViennaFair 2012, ViennaFair 2012
Andris Breže. Miera Dzīve . 5.10.2012 - 09.01.2013, Andris Breže. A Life of Peace.5.10.2012 - 09.01.2013
Daiga Krūze. Slēpnis. 11. 02. - 02. 04. 2013., Daiga Kruze. Hideout. 11. 02. - 02. 04. 2013.
Kristians Brekte. 15.04. - 17.05.2013., Kristians Brekte. 15.04. - 17.05.2013.
Izstādes kuratori Astrida Riņķe, Vilnis Vējš
Izstāde tapusi sadarbībā ar Zentas Loginas fondu.
Zentas Loginas mākslas atpazīšanas zīmes ir abstrakta formu valoda un kosmiskas tēmas. Lai gan tās šķiet nesavienojamas – abstrakcijā nav jāmeklē attēlojums, līdz ar to arī noteikta tematika – interese gan par vienu, gan otru acīmredzami pavadījusi mākslinieci ilgākā laika periodā, sākot no 60. gadiem līdz pat nāvei 1983. gadā. Ne tikai interese, arī regulārs smags darbs dzīvokļa četrās sienās palīdzējis Zentai Loginai atrast savu oriģinālu veidu, kā sakausēt tīrās mākslas – krāsu un formu valdzinājumu ar attēliem no kosmosa pētniecības arsenāla, pievienojot labu tiesu vispārinoša simbolisma. Zenta Logina spēja astronomu novērotās parādībās saskatīt estētisku formu, pārvēršot to ideāli atrisinātos kompozīcijas uzdevumos. Radies ir tas, ko mēs šodien varam saukt ne tikai par Zentas Loginas, bet arī latviešu nonkonformisma mākslas zelta fondu – gleznas, skulptūras, pēc mākslinieces metiem austi gobelēni un autortehnikā darināti darbi, kuros mākslas veidi pārplūst viens otrā pāri izšķiramām robežām.
Bez novatoriskām kompozīcijas vērtībām un sižetiskās ekstravagances Zentas Loginas darbi sajūsmina arī ar kvalitāti, kas tradicionāli raksturīga latviešu mākslai – ārkārtīgi smalku krāsu izjūtu, spēju piešķirt tām īpašu dzidrumu un „skanējumu”. Tuvinātos toņos vai, retāk – kontrastējošos krāsu salikumos māksliniece daudz izmanto pagleznojuma un lazējuma, virsmas uzirdinājuma un patinējuma paņēmienus, lakas un bronzas, alumīnija pulverus. Viņa nav vairījusies no impulsīviem žestiem – otas raksta un skrāpējumiem, bet savienojusi tos ar kontrolētu krāsvielas plūdumu, pietonējumiem, pulējumiem. Kopā viss kalpo vienam mērķim – īpašam mirdzuma efektam, kas, domājams, ne tikai atdarina kosmosa ķermeņu starošanu, bet arī izsaka garīgu saturu.
Gan neparasti konsekventā pievēršanās abstrakcijai, gan tēmu izvēle katra savā laikā raisījusi neizpratni un veidojusi neuzticības pilnu attieksmi pret mākslinieces veikumu no varas iestāžu un mākslas autoritāšu puses, ļoti apgrūtinot viņas darbu un gandrīz pilnīgi ierobežojot pieeju auditorijai. Šī attieksme vēl joprojām nav pilnībā pārvarēta. Zenta Logina bijusi gan izslēgta no LPSR Mākslinieku savienības 1950. gadā „par formālismu” (lai gan tolaik mākslinieces darbi nebija ne tuvu tik abstrakti kā vēlākajā posmā), gan pieņemta atpakaļ 1953. gadā kā dekoratīvi lietišķās jomas pārstāve. (Kopš tā laika viņai bija līdzautore – māsa Elīze Atāre, kas Loginas gleznieciskās idejas pārvērta tekstilmateriālos). Padomju mākslā Loginas aizraušanās ar abstrakciju tika vērtēta kā pārāk radikāla, pat salīdzinot ar tādiem stila radiniekiem kā Ojārs Ābols vai Lidija Auza, kas tomēr izmantoja arī „piezemētāku” saturiskumu gan kompozīcijās, gan darbu nosaukumos. Šodien, savukārt, primitīvi mērot latviešu mākslu pēc Rietumu pasaules „kalendāra”, Loginas abstrakcionisms 70. gados šķiet pilnīgi ordinārs un pat tāds kā nosebojis. Līdzīgi debesu ķermeņu attēlojums, kas visumā atbilda sava laika jūsmai par kosmosa apguvi, likās pārāk nekonkrēts sava laika oficiālajai ideoloģijai, bet aizdomīgi ezoterisks laikmetīgās mākslas racionālo strāvojumu kontekstā. Turklāt tas vienmēr bijis arī ārpus nacionāli tradicionālas mākslas izpratnes.
Izstādi kuratore Astrīda Riņķe nosaukusi Constellation – vārdā, kas apzīmē debesu spīdekļu izkārtojumu debess jumā. Mākslas darbu kopa, kas glabājas Zentas Loginas fonda kolekcijā, neapšaubāmi ir kā spožs zvaigznājs, kas atspīdējis līdz šodienai no visumā patumšā padomju perioda zemajām mākslinieciskās brīvības debesīm. Pārnestā nozīmē par „zvaigžņu konstellāciju” sauc arī apstākļu kopumu, kas palīdz vai traucē notikumu gaitai. Var teikt, ka tā bija reti nelabvēlīga Zentas Loginas daiļradei laikā, kad tā patiešām atraisījās un uzplauka. Tomēr pašas mākslinieces mērķtiecība un konsekvence savu ideju īstenošanā panākusi to, ka konstellācija mainās, diemžēl pārāk vēlu un lēni: ja Latviešu māksla oficiālās institūcijas pēc inerces izturas distancēti pret savulaik netaisnīgi izraidītās kolēģes mantojumu, tad bez tā gandrīz neiztikt padomju perioda pārskatos ārzemēs, kur speciālisti taujā: „Bija latviešu mākslā nonkonformisms vai ne?” Uz diezgan kolaborācijai atvērtā latviešu mākslas mantojuma fona ir iespēja atbildēt, ka vismaz viena māksliniece ir gadu desmitiem strādājusi tikai mākslas vārdā, nerēķinoties ar statusu vai peļņu, un viņas mākslas, tāpat kā pārliecības iedvesmojošais starojums nav zaudējis spēku joprojām.
Vilnis Vējš